Multi-Agent Architecture Tribunal

QUORUM

Stop making architecture decisions alone.

Multi-agent tribunal for technical governance. 7 specialized AI agents debate your architecture decisions using real repository evidence, producing committable ADRs with a Decision Confidence Score. Built on IBM Bob.

Capabilities

7

7-Agent Tribunal

Conservative, Reformer, Historian, Economist, Risk Officer, Engineer, and Judge debate your architecture decision with adversarial stances, producing a Decision Confidence Score.

X

Adversarial Cross-Examination

After Round 1, opposing agents confront each other's arguments in Round 2, forced to maintain, revise, or concede their positions. No consensus by committee.

Time Machine

Predict what Quorum would have advised before a decision was made. Validated against the actual git commit record - every predicted concern confirmed or denied.

Repository Health

Galaxium Travels - live assessment

Health Dimensions

Architecture Decision Records

Decisions produced by the Quorum Council

0 active
No ADRs found in docs/decisions/

Latest DCS Breakdown

ADR-2026-001 - Java Service Consolidation

Evidence Strength
82
Weight: 20%
Historical Precedent
85
Weight: 15%
Economic Viability
35
Weight: 20%
Risk Assessment
85
Weight: 20%
Technical Feasibility
50
Weight: 15%
Council Consensus
83
Weight: 10%

Convene the Council on a New Decision

Let 6 specialized agents debate the evidence from your repository and produce a committable ADR with a Decision Confidence Score.